RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

All training and programming related queries and banter here

Moderators: mgil, chromoly, Manveer

Post Reply
User avatar
throwinshapes
Registered User
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed May 09, 2018 4:50 am
Location: Dover, NH
Age: 34

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#21

Post by throwinshapes » Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:19 am

stevan wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 2:13 am Yeah, but why? I've read the articles but I still don't see it. Can someone summarize in few sentences why should one strive to use RPE? Specifically, using a 1-10 scale with .5 precision and tracking E1RM's part of it. Why?

I'm not trying to be argumentative.

Please no:
- many strong people use it
- adding 5lbs and training to failure all the time strawman
If you're not trying to troll or be argumentative, why don't you describe what problems you have with the approach specifically, to show us you've actually researched the subject rather than throw out a 5 yr old's "why" and make us do all the work.
Manveer wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 6:19 am Stevan won’t watch these, but in case anyone else is interested, I find that these videos do a good job of explaining common RPE misconceptions:
The Bridge E-Book has a good discussion about RPE as well. Weighs in on both sides.

User avatar
Cody
Equipment Guru
Posts: 2047
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 8:14 am
Age: 39

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#22

Post by Cody » Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:45 am

I sent this thread to @MikeTuchscherer on Instagram, so hopefully he shows up to discuss with us!

Bliss
Registered User
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:29 pm
Location: Russia, N56 E49
Age: 33

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#23

Post by Bliss » Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:49 am

Epic thread in the making right here!
Lol at the subtitle too :mrgreen:
hsilman wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 5:11 am .....

RTS or BBM style training is a whole different thing btw. RPE and those are not synonymous.
I'm glad you brought it up, because despite the name of the thread, it reads so far as exclusively "RTS - flavored" (which is neither bad or good, of course).

I propose we add BBM RPE - based free programs to the list:

The bridge 1.0 - https://www.barbellmedicine.com/the-bridge/

And

Scivation general program - https://www.barbellmedicine.com/scivationstrong/


BOTH these contain a supporting article explaining the basics of RPE and the how's and why's.

Note that the scivation program assumed a modification for an additional 4-week block to be followed by a test day.
Details can be found here, post n.8 -
https://startingstrength.com/resources/ ... inued.html

User avatar
OrderInChaos
Registered User
Posts: 584
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 12:36 pm

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#24

Post by OrderInChaos » Tue Sep 04, 2018 2:17 pm

RyanHartigan wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 5:51 pm Let’s start with what a generic block periodization template would look like for a hypothetical trainee with:
A 300-400 wilks.
• An interest in powerlifting.
• No understanding of RPE.
• No knowledge of how to record their training history.
Do you think this should be held back on until that 300ish Wilks is attained? Say, v. long layoff or a really fat, recently post-novice making slow but steady body comp gainz. Should they refrain from learning RPE until they're closer to a "physio-typical post-novice/early intermediate" condition, or is it good to learn earlier in your view... say using your "Rate the Top Set only" with whatever NLP-alike they were using prior?

RyanHartigan
Registered User
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:34 pm
Age: 32

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#25

Post by RyanHartigan » Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:29 pm

Bliss wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:49 am I'm glad you brought it up, because despite the name of the thread, it reads so far as exclusively "RTS - flavored" (which is neither bad or good, of course).
I think it's good. It's pretty clear that the iniative of Michael Tuchscherer is the reason these ideas exist in the context of weightlifting.

He's the one creating these ideas and putting out information on them, so it makes sense that the discussion on the topic would revolve around RTS with only peripheral discussion about what others are doing.

In fact I was going to call it the RTS megathread but:
1. There are other methods I like to look at, critique and experiment with;
2. I've never worked with RTS, and;
3. I'm not here to shill for RTS (Even though I openly consider Mike T to be the GOAT drug-free lifter & coach combo)

Sometimes the others doing it don't have the same creativity and bring to the market either pale comparisons of the original or different flavours of the same ice-cream, which don't really bring anything worth discussing to the table.
Bliss wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:49 am I propose we add BBM RPE - based free programs to the list:
The discussion about BBM is somewhat restriced by their templates being paid, but I don't think there's anything special to unpack about them. Take the 12wk strength - it's a stock wave loaded block periodiaztion cycle with an RPE overlay and Jordan's double funnel thing applied.

They also have threads here and their own forum, plus I don't want too much of the 'traffic they could use' being diverted.

Suffice it to say I don't like the discussion about stock top down templates, and I really don't like paid templates.

For the amount of money you spend puzzle piecing together a plan buying several templates (totally removed from your individual response from the training) you can literally have a consultation with an elite level coach who will devise a training plan based on your training history and characteristics.

Add that to the cost of a monthly subscription to your peri workout and whey and you can actually be coached by someone like Mike.

I can't tell if I'm a responder or not to popular supplements. But, decent customised programming has added like 100kgs to my total this year.
Bliss wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:49 am Lol at the subtitle too
I'm not even sure it belongs in the training forum given the new SS position that RPE is mutually exclusive with 'training'
OrderInChaos wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 2:17 pm Do you think this should be held back on until that 300ish Wilks is attained? Say, v. long layoff or a really fat, recently post-novice making slow but steady body comp gainz. Should they refrain from learning RPE until they're closer to a "physio-typical post-novice/early intermediate" condition, or is it good to learn earlier in your view... say using your "Rate the Top Set only" with whatever NLP-alike they were using prior?
On the general concept of bottom up training, no I don't think you should hold back.

I put 300-400 wilks in that particular 8 week meet prep because I figured it would encompass basically everyone who has been lifting long enough to be interested in RPE and powerlifting, encouraging them to experiment with it and be sold on the idea after having a high degree of success.

The same is true of the Generalised Intermediate Program.

Using my rationale for ES, I see no reason in principle why you can't ES a rank novice and get them fluent in RPE within a month or two. I have seen this happen and done it myself but my experiences are limited and YMMV. Consider this template:

Day 1
Squat

Day 2
Bench

Day 3
Deadlift

Day 4
Press

Start with a loading scheme like: one set @50-70% stop @8

Day 1
Squat @50-70% stop @8

Day 2
Bench @50-70% stop @8

Day 3
Deadlift @50-70% stop @8

Day 4
Press @50-70% stop @8

The weight on the bar doesn't really seem to matter as long as you are getting somewhere between say 4-20 reps at the extremes. You might be suprised that this is sufficient to add weight to the bar from session to session (like anything on a rank novice.) It's difficult as it's usually me who is deciding when to stop the set. If you were on your own, had no idea and wanted to start you could use something familiar like:

Day 1
Squat 3x5

Day 2
Bench 3x5

Day 3
Deadlift 3x5

Day 4
Press 3x5

When ERMs start falling or stagnating I try some of these ideas:

• Add or drop reps e.g. do 6s or 7s;
• Add a set;
• Stop when you hit a grindy set, drop 10% and do 2-4 backoff sets;
• Add an extra movement e.g. squat on day 4 as well;
• Add an assistance movement that modifies the ROM, tempo or stance & grip. (some that require no extra equipment and many find effective: close grip / wide grip BP, wide stance/narrow stance squats, deficit deadlifts, alternate stance deadlifts, pins & pause squats/bench/deadlifts;
• Add supplemental exercises like front squats or rows.
• Completely change loading schemes from a few sets across at relatively high intensity to (in no particular order): - much higher volume @ lower intensities (e,g, load lots of volume @6 after a heavy top set), ascending sets (4@7/8/9/5%LDx1-3, 4@7/8/9/10%LDx3-6), more moderate & intensities (5@7/8x5), myo sets/myo drop sets (or Hanley sets and density blocks if you prefer his position vs Borges)
• Rinse and repeat.

It's pretty simple stuff and you can't really go wrong, though you might get unlucky. It probably won't be that long until your training is making you long term, consistent progress or looks like the generic templates in the OP.

When it comes to things like, optimised lift/block phase potentiation, TTP, ETP, deciding when to pivot, when to deload, how to peak etc it gets more complicated and individualised.

But, if you are gathering the data, you might start seeing patterns and trends 'emerge' which you can use to guide your future training (and to discuss here).

User avatar
MattimusMaximus
Registered User
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 2:08 am
Location: Nexus of the Universe
Age: 38

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#26

Post by MattimusMaximus » Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:59 pm

Very awesome thread!

I keep getting tripped up trying to figure out how RPE works with 5’s during accumulation. Everything I’ve read says that block of training is between 55-70% but RPE would be higher percentages if we’re talking 5@8’s. That confuses me a bit so I elected to use a top single using RPE and base 70% ish volume work off of that.

User avatar
Testiclaw
Registered User
Posts: 865
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:28 am

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#27

Post by Testiclaw » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:24 pm

MattimusMaximus wrote: Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:59 pm Very awesome thread!

I keep getting tripped up trying to figure out how RPE works with 5’s during accumulation. Everything I’ve read says that block of training is between 55-70% but RPE would be higher percentages if we’re talking 5@8’s. That confuses me a bit so I elected to use a top single using RPE and base 70% ish volume work off of that.
Part of the reason the percentages are a tad lower from a single @8 is because of the small amount of fatigue you get from said single.

workliftsleeprepeat
Registered User
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 12:26 pm

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#28

Post by workliftsleeprepeat » Fri Sep 07, 2018 12:32 pm

Is there any way of adding exercises with that tracking application, or is it unnecessary? I wanted to track previous workouts into the app, so I had a look to do that, but there's no options for exercises like Face-Pulls or Shrugs.

denashes
Registered User
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 10:29 am
Location: Northern VA
Age: 37

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#29

Post by denashes » Fri Sep 07, 2018 12:57 pm

workliftsleeprepeat wrote: Fri Sep 07, 2018 12:32 pm Is there any way of adding exercises with that tracking application, or is it unnecessary? I wanted to track previous workouts into the app, so I had a look to do that, but there's no options for exercises like Face-Pulls or Shrugs.
Shrugs should be listed under the Vertical Push category. You can add exercises by opening the menu on the top left and going to Manage Exercises under the Training Log heading.

workliftsleeprepeat
Registered User
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 12:26 pm

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#30

Post by workliftsleeprepeat » Fri Sep 07, 2018 2:02 pm

denashes wrote: Fri Sep 07, 2018 12:57 pm Shrugs should be listed under the Vertical Push category.
I didn't even bother to look in vertical push cause I considered it a pull lmao. Thanks though. I'm gonna track in my last few workouts into this now to get some readings.

User avatar
OrderInChaos
Registered User
Posts: 584
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 12:36 pm

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#31

Post by OrderInChaos » Fri Sep 07, 2018 5:39 pm

RyanHartigan wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:29 pm
OrderInChaos wrote: Tue Sep 04, 2018 2:17 pm ...
On the general concept of bottom up training...
Thank you for the quick and very thorough response! That's a lot of good stuff to chew on, it's appreciated.

Mellamomud
Registered User
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2018 12:36 am

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#32

Post by Mellamomud » Fri Sep 07, 2018 7:16 pm

Squat: 6@7/8/9/5%LD
Bench: 6@7/8/9/5%LD
Dumbbell incline BP: 20-25 +3-5x

Day 2
Deadlift (sumo): 6@7/8/9/5%LD
CGBP: 8@7/8/9/5%LD
Belt squat: 20-25 +3-5x

Day 3
Pin squat : 8@7/8/9/5%LD
Incline Bench: 8@7/8/9/5%LD
Dumbbell press: 20-25 +3-5x

Day 4
2" deficit DL (conv): 8@7/8/9/5%LD
Press: 6@7/8/9/5%LDx2
Pendlay Row: 20-25 +3-5x

I’m going to give this a whirl. Thoughts?

RyanHartigan
Registered User
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:34 pm
Age: 32

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#33

Post by RyanHartigan » Fri Sep 07, 2018 8:07 pm

Testiclaw wrote: Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:24 pm
MattimusMaximus wrote: Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:59 pm Very awesome thread!

I keep getting tripped up trying to figure out how RPE works with 5’s during accumulation. Everything I’ve read says that block of training is between 55-70% but RPE would be higher percentages if we’re talking 5@8’s. That confuses me a bit so I elected to use a top single using RPE and base 70% ish volume work off of that.
Part of the reason the percentages are a tad lower from a single @8 is because of the small amount of fatigue you get from said single.
@MattimusMaximus I'm not sure what you mean, can you give an example?

If you're talking about what @Testiclaw is saying, I would stick with the %ages from the RPE table.

Inter/intra individual reponses differ drastically. For example, without practice 1@8 and @9 substantially effect my backoff sets. But after a few weeks doing them(1@8), they are a part of my warm-up and have zero effect on subsequent sets.

It also depends if you are doing fixed sets or fatigue %s. If you are doing fatigue %s or 'stop @' protcols you would keep the same weight sets across and stop when you hit your target. If you are doing fixed volume you would have to take weight off the bar or increase rest times.
Mellamomud wrote: Fri Sep 07, 2018 7:16 pm Day 1
Squat: 6@7/8/9/5%LD
Bench: 6@7/8/9/5%LD
Dumbbell incline BP: 20-25 +3-5x

Day 2
Deadlift (sumo): 6@7/8/9/5%LD
CGBP: 8@7/8/9/5%LD
Belt squat: 20-25 +3-5x

Day 3
Pin squat : 8@7/8/9/5%LD
Incline Bench: 8@7/8/9/5%LD
Dumbbell press: 20-25 +3-5x

Day 4
2" deficit DL (conv): 8@7/8/9/5%LD
Press: 6@7/8/9/5%LDx2
Pendlay Row: 20-25 +3-5x

I’m going to give this a whirl. Thoughts?
Looks like a good microcycle, nice exercise selection with the myos too. What is your competition pull? I'm guessing by those rep schemes you treat S/B/Sumo/P as comp lifts?

From one of the other threads:
PatrickDB wrote: Mon May 14, 2018 12:47 pm @wk105, I'm old and bad at IG. Can you please find me lifter doing 15 singles at 90%?, or other examples from the OP (if it's easier for you)? Because the one example you posted is also the least crazy.

I might ask about this in the Mike T Q&A...

(The subtext here is that I am developing a model for "fatigue cost" and if these workouts are possible without affecting work done ~48 hours later, then my model is destroyed. This would be interesting.)
I attempted to do something like this when I read that other thread:

Week A
Day 1
Squat (w/ belt): 1@8, -19%x5 (74%) (Stop @9.5)
Comp Bench: 1@8, -2%x1x9-15 (90%) (Stop @9.5)
Row: 10@7x4

Day 2
Deadlift (w/ belt): 1@8, -22%x5 (70%) (Stop @9.5)
Press: 7@7/8/9/5%LD
303 Squat: 10@7x4

Day 3
Beltless Squat: 6@/7/8/9/5%LD
Ram Bench: 5@7/8/9/5%LD
Pin Bench (chest): 10@7x4.

Day 4
3" Block Pull: 6@6/7/8x3
CGBP: 1@8, -22%x5x8-10 (70%) (Stop @9.5)
Deadlift: 10@7x4

It ended up looking like this:

Day 1
Squat with Belt
221.5 x 1 @ 8.5
175.5 x 5 @ 6
175.5 x 5 @ 6.5
175.5 x 5 @ 6.5
175.5 x 5 @ 7
175.5 x 5 @ 7
175.5 x 5 @ 7.5
175.5 x 5 @ 7
175.5 x 5 @ 7.5
175.5 x 5 @ 8

Bench Press with Belt
121.5 x 1 @ 8.5
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 7.5
119 x 1 @ 9
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 8
119 x 1 @ 8.5
119 x 1 @ 8.5

Row
80 x 10 @ 6
80 x 10 @ 7
80 x 10 @ 7
80 x 10 @ 7

Day 2
Deadlift (sumo) with Belt
242 x 1 @ 10
170 x 5 @ 6
170 x 5 @ 6
170 x 5 @ 7
170 x 5 @ 6.5
170 x 5 @ 6.5
170 x 5 @ 7
170 x 5 @ 7
170 x 5 @ 7
170 x 5 @ 7.5

Standing Military with Belt
61.5 x 7 @ 7
63.5 x 7 @ 7.5
65.5 x 7 @ 8.5
61 x 7 @ 7

303 Tempo Squat
106 x 10 @ 7
106 x 10 @ 8
106 x 10 @ 9

Day 3
Squat
140.5 x 6 @ 6
150.5 x 6 @ 8
155 x 6 @ 9
145.5 x 6 @ 9

Bench Press with Ram
143.5 x 5 @ 7
148 x 5 @ 8.5
143.5 x 5 @ 9

Low Pin Bench Press
80 x 10 @ 8
80 x 10 @ 8
80 x 10 @ 9

Day 4
3" Block Deadlift (sumo)
153 x 6 @ 6
157.5 x 6 @ 7
162.5 x 6 @ 8
162.5 x 6 @ 8
162.5 x 6 @ 8

Close Grip Bench Press
123.5 x 1 @ 8.5
92 x 5 @ 6
92 x 5 @ 6
92 x 5 @ 6
92 x 5 @ 6
92 x 5 @ 6
92 x 5 @ 7
92 x 5 @ 6.5
92 x 5 @ 6
92 x 5 @ 7
92 x 5 @ 7

Deadlift (conv)
115.5 x 10 @ 7
115.5 x 10 @ 7
115.5 x 10 @ 7
115.5 x 10 @ 7

I ran this for about 3 weeks before any dip in performance, and I could probably have gone longer if I didn't switch to night shift.

It's interesting that I couldn't even hit the RPE prescriptions because I ran out of time doing so many sets.

@wk105 I can't remember if you wrote about your response to the protocol, but I'd be interested in hearing if you found it effective.
Manveer wrote: Mon May 14, 2018 10:48 am
PatrickDB wrote: Mon May 14, 2018 9:54 am
wk105 wrote: Mon May 14, 2018 5:42 am If you've got the work capacity for it, it's fine.

Here's Mike T squatting 700x1 and 565x5x8. This looks like x1@7.5 followed by around 72%x5x8.
Can you find an example of a RTS lifter doing one of the crazier prescriptions (15 singles at 90%)?
I've done it. I was not able to repeat the same weight more than 2-3 times without hitting @9 or more. Then again, I seem to fatigue quickly.
Isn't it interesting seeing how completely different two trained lifters can respond to a prescription. FWIW I did my bench singles with ~60s rest.

User avatar
JohnHelton
Registered User
Posts: 4451
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 12:17 pm
Location: Bozeman, MT
Age: 51
Contact:

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#34

Post by JohnHelton » Sat Sep 08, 2018 9:05 pm

I really think RPE and ES don’t require much knowledge and skill. I am coaching a buddy from work using this approach. He is a novice and just finished his first 4 week development cycle with sets of 8 reps on his competition lifts. S/B/D all exploded upward in a way that he wouldn’t have achieved if he had methodical just added 5 pounds. He didn’t know how strong he was until he was honestly searching for what was an 8 RPE. Next cycle we will focus on sets of 5s and then the following cycle will have heavy singles plus sets of 3s. There are so many variations to try. We will just see what he responds to and what he likes mentally. Incidentally, I am not messing with Time To Peak with him. I consider that to be not as important, especially for a more casual lifter. He has no interest in competition.

wk105
Registered User
Posts: 609
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 2:11 am

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#35

Post by wk105 » Sun Sep 09, 2018 1:41 am

RyanHartigan wrote: Fri Sep 07, 2018 8:07 pm @wk105 I can't remember if you wrote about your response to the protocol, but I'd be interested in hearing if you found it effective.


Definitely. 74%x5x9 is one of the most effective protocols for me.

User avatar
MattimusMaximus
Registered User
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 2:08 am
Location: Nexus of the Universe
Age: 38

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#36

Post by MattimusMaximus » Sun Sep 09, 2018 8:23 am

MattimusMaximus wrote: Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:59 pm Very awesome thread!

I keep getting tripped up trying to figure out how RPE works with 5’s during accumulation. Everything I’ve read says that block of training is between 55-70% but RPE would be higher percentages if we’re talking 5@8’s. That confuses me a bit so I elected to use a top single using RPE and base 70% ish volume work off of that.
@RyanHartigan For example, most of what I'm reading online says accumulation blocks are between 55-70% for main sets like 5x5@70% for example. If I were to use RPE/RTS methods of @8 for work sets that would have me reaching upwards of 80% for sets of 5 @8. From what I've been reading, percentages that high are getting into the Transmutation Block. That's the only part that trips me up for using RTS-type methods for accumulation blocks. I may be misunderstanding something though.

Due to the confusion, on my part, I've elected to use a top single around 90% using RPE as my gauge and then doing back-off volume for 65-70%... I'm new to block periodization though so I'm thankful for this thread.

User avatar
Cody
Equipment Guru
Posts: 2047
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 8:14 am
Age: 39

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#37

Post by Cody » Sun Sep 09, 2018 12:04 pm

MattimusMaximus wrote: Sun Sep 09, 2018 8:23 amFor example, most of what I'm reading online says accumulation blocks are between 55-70% for main sets like 5x5@70% for example. If I were to use RPE/RTS methods of @8 for work sets that would have me reaching upwards of 80% for sets of 5 @8.
Then do 5x8 @ 70% instead if that's the intensity you want to work at.

User avatar
JohnHelton
Registered User
Posts: 4451
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 12:17 pm
Location: Bozeman, MT
Age: 51
Contact:

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#38

Post by JohnHelton » Sun Sep 09, 2018 5:13 pm

Or 8x5 @ 70% but get it all done in 20 minutes. Mike T. talked somewhere about trying to get the warmup done in 10 minutes and forcing yourself to get the mainsets done in 20 minutes. I like that technique for limiting rest when you are doing more sets with lower RPEs. Either way, you are getting in 40 reps in 20 minutes at 70%. That sounds like good effort. Of course, I don’t understand all the muscle activation stuff. Also, Nuckols talks about the number of meaningful sets (say at @7 or 8) rather than the number of reps, so I could be wrong. But I think Sheiko and Hanley might agree with that approach. I don’t know about Mike T.

RyanHartigan
Registered User
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:34 pm
Age: 32

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#39

Post by RyanHartigan » Sun Sep 09, 2018 5:25 pm

MattimusMaximus wrote: Sun Sep 09, 2018 8:23 am @RyanHartigan For example, most of what I'm reading online says accumulation blocks are between 55-70% for main sets like 5x5@70% for example. If I were to use RPE/RTS methods of @8 for work sets that would have me reaching upwards of 80% for sets of 5 @8. From what I've been reading, percentages that high are getting into the Transmutation Block. That's the only part that trips me up for using RTS-type methods for accumulation blocks. I may be misunderstanding something though.

Due to the confusion, on my part, I've elected to use a top single around 90% using RPE as my gauge and then doing back-off volume for 65-70%... I'm new to block periodization though so I'm thankful for this thread.
I'm still not sure what the problem is with 5s around 80% being @8. This is fine for an accumulation block using ascending sets. 4-10@7/8/9/5%LD is totally ordinary in an accumulation/volume/developmental/loading block.

If you're saying the RPE table doesn't correlate well for you, you can either A: Do a custom RPE table and input it into trac for it to base it's calculations off or B: acknowledge that your ERMs will be consistently X too high or Y too low. Once you know the ballpark of X & Y it's not a huge problem.

What @Cody said though. It sounds like you are doing a protocol like: "Exercise: 1@7.5, -19%x5x5-10" which is fine too if it's generating results.

If for some reason you think a protocol like 6@7/8/9/5%LD is not going to be effective in an accumulation block, I would encourage you to try it and see for yourself.

Another thing which may or may not be accurate is you seem to still want to speak in %s. If there is a difference between the % you are using and the RPE, I would argue that the % is more likely to be wrong, not the RPE. If you put aside the thought of %s in your mind and focus on the stress being applied, which is what you are adapting to, I think you will find the process a lot easier.
JohnHelton wrote: Sat Sep 08, 2018 9:05 pm I really think RPE and ES don’t require much knowledge and skill. I am coaching a buddy from work using this approach. He is a novice and just finished his first 4 week development cycle with sets of 8 reps on his competition lifts. S/B/D all exploded upward in a way that he wouldn’t have achieved if he had methodical just added 5 pounds. He didn’t know how strong he was until he was honestly searching for what was an 8 RPE. Next cycle we will focus on sets of 5s and then the following cycle will have heavy singles plus sets of 3s. There are so many variations to try. We will just see what he responds to and what he likes mentally. Incidentally, I am not messing with Time To Peak with him. I consider that to be not as important, especially for a more casual lifter. He has no interest in competition.
I agree, people make it out like RPE is more complicated than %s. I find the reverse is true, it's much easier to program using RPEs and adjust your training as you go along with no messing around with spreadsheets and calculators based off week/month/year old data, then re-adjusting when it inevitably doesn't work and rinsing and repeating the process.

It was a pain in the ass to convert that template into % in the OP and wouldn't have been worth the time inputting it into excel with 'enter your 1rm here' functions and then adjusting it to my training as it evolved.

Even for a non-competitor it might be useful to take note that you have a system wide or lift crash every 4 weeks, for example, but I get what you're saying.
wk105 wrote: Sun Sep 09, 2018 1:41 am
RyanHartigan wrote: Fri Sep 07, 2018 8:07 pm @wk105 I can't remember if you wrote about your response to the protocol, but I'd be interested in hearing if you found it effective.


Definitely. 74%x5x9 is one of the most effective protocols for me.
JohnHelton wrote: Sun Sep 09, 2018 5:13 pm Or 8x5 @ 70% but get it all done in 20 minutes. Mike T. talked somewhere about trying to get the warmup done in 10 minutes and forcing yourself to get the mainsets done in 20 minutes. I like that technique for limiting rest when you are doing more sets with lower RPEs. Either way, you are getting in 40 reps in 20 minutes at 70%. That sounds like good effort. Of course, I don’t understand all the muscle activation stuff. Also, Nuckols talks about the number of meaningful sets (say at @7 or 8) rather than the number of reps, so I could be wrong. But I think Sheiko and Hanley might agree with that approach. I don’t know about Mike T.
It's been a mixed bag for me, so I'm going to reserve my judgement for it in my own training until I get some more time to experiment with it.

Similar protocols have been extremely successful for others I've used it on in the short term. This includes women on the smaller side and SHW males, which a lot of people seem to think high volume starting ~@6 is inappropriate for.

I've also had middle weights use them on bench press with absolutely minimal/no success, or no benefit (in 1RM strength tests at least) to doing 10 sets vs 5. Maybe training with that high volume has benefits for subsequent protocols though.

User avatar
JohnHelton
Registered User
Posts: 4451
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 12:17 pm
Location: Bozeman, MT
Age: 51
Contact:

Re: RPE Megathread: The Sweet Smell of Easy.

#40

Post by JohnHelton » Sun Sep 09, 2018 6:40 pm

@RyanHartigan, something I have noticed so far with my RTS programmed training is that my coach has only asked me to hit @8 for topsets for squat and deadlift. However, he has programmed @9s for bench. I haven’t asked him about this, but I would guess it has to do with my ability to recovery. Maybe that is because I’m an older lifter. I’ll ask him.

Post Reply