Bench press width article

Ask questions, post videos, help others not screw up

Moderators: mgil, d0uevenlift

User avatar
slowmotion
Registered User
Posts: 3195
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:39 am
Location: Norway
Age: 66

Re: Bench press width article

#21

Post by slowmotion » Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:50 pm

Thanks, I'll give that a try.

User avatar
BenM
Registered User
Posts: 3850
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:18 pm
Age: 47

Re: Bench press width article

#22

Post by BenM » Wed Dec 20, 2017 1:36 pm

SJB wrote: Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:25 am To be on the same programming as me you will have to become a program hopper par excellence. I am happy to increase my bench .5kg (hope you saw the .) per week. I think you should aim a lot higher than me.
Oh I'm definitely aiming higher than that. But gotta eat that elephant one bite at a time. If I could make half a kilo a week progress i'd be stoked too. That would see me hit my medium term goal (2 plates) by the end of 2018. Hopefully without gaining a ton of body weight.

User avatar
cwd
Registered User
Posts: 3400
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:34 am
Location: central Ohio
Age: 58

Re: Bench press width article

#23

Post by cwd » Wed Dec 20, 2017 1:58 pm

I'm happy if I gain a kilo every 3 weeks on bench/press. But I've been recomping, surely I'd improve faster if I were gaining weight.

User avatar
BenM
Registered User
Posts: 3850
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:18 pm
Age: 47

Re: Bench press width article

#24

Post by BenM » Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:26 pm

cwd wrote: Wed Dec 20, 2017 1:58 pm I'm happy if I gain a kilo every 3 weeks on bench/press. But I've been recomping, surely I'd improve faster if I were gaining weight.
Yeah, me too. That is, I'm just (barely) eating maintenance calories, I think. I was seeing pretty good gains last time I was in a surplus, but was just gaining too fast. Trying for a bit more nuance™ this time.

User avatar
Culican
Registered User
Posts: 1415
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 7:39 pm
Location: It's a dry heat
Age: 69

Re: Bench press width article

#25

Post by Culican » Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:39 am

Okay, I have been putting my ring finger on the ring marks but after measuring it seems that my pinkies should be just inside (touching the edge) of the rings. Interestingly, whenever my shoulder acts up I always switch from my normal grip to this grip to let it recover.

User avatar
KDW
HODGE
Posts: 542
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:37 pm
Age: 43

Re: Bench press width article

#26

Post by KDW » Mon Dec 25, 2017 7:52 pm

I'm gonna give this one a big nope. I bench index on ring and that's 32 inches grip width. This is where I'm strongest. I have done pinky on ring and middle finger on ring and this is just stronger. I measured the distance between my ac joints to be 17 inches. I'm nearly twice that distance in bench grip. Also, the wider grip feels better on my shoulders which is important to me since I've had surgery in the past.

User avatar
BenM
Registered User
Posts: 3850
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:18 pm
Age: 47

Re: Bench press width article

#27

Post by BenM » Mon Dec 25, 2017 8:08 pm

But you are a beast @KDW :)

I’ve been benching with the recommended grip in this article for the past week or two. I don’t think it’s made a massive difference either way, but my lifts are puny. What I will say is I’ve increased the volume a lot so if it’s safer at this width I’ll stick with it.

User avatar
Wilhelm
Little Musk Ox
Posts: 9728
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:58 pm
Location: Living Room
Age: 62

Re: Bench press width article

#28

Post by Wilhelm » Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:53 pm

KDW wrote: Mon Dec 25, 2017 7:52 pm I'm gonna give this one a big nope. I bench index on ring and that's 32 inches grip width. This is where I'm strongest. I have done pinky on ring and middle finger on ring and this is just stronger. I measured the distance between my ac joints to be 17 inches. I'm nearly twice that distance in bench grip. Also, the wider grip feels better on my shoulders which is important to me since I've had surgery in the past.
This topic has entered my brain again recently.
It's interesting that the wider grip is easier on your shoulders, @KDW.
I think i read narrow(er) is better, and just didn't explore further.

It just occurs to me with all the work i'm putting in, it would be silly to not at least try the wider grip.
I've been doing pinkies on the rings since i posted this thread. So a full year now.

Just watched a woman lifter in the 66 kilo class bench 264lbs in competition, and most of the lifters are using a wider grip than me.

I did move a finger wider very breifly a few days ago. It felt weird. But i need to give it a real shot.
If i'm leaving easy gains on the table, i need to know one way or the other.

I'll move out one finger width at a time. Edit to add - I'm just going to try my top single Saturday with max grip.
Better to know right away how that feels, and if it gives me a lot more power.
Better to try it now while i'm relatively early in my meet prep.

ChrisMcCarthy1979
Registered User
Posts: 1973
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 2:30 am

Re: Bench press width article

#29

Post by ChrisMcCarthy1979 » Fri Dec 21, 2018 12:20 am

I don't know if I would jump to just doing your top single with a wide grip...I'd want a good few reps in with it first.

But then again if you are at a place in your Cycle where your "top single" is easily manageable then please ignore.

User avatar
Wilhelm
Little Musk Ox
Posts: 9728
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:58 pm
Location: Living Room
Age: 62

Re: Bench press width article

#30

Post by Wilhelm » Fri Dec 21, 2018 5:09 am

ChrisMcCarthy1979 wrote: Fri Dec 21, 2018 12:20 am I don't know if I would jump to just doing your top single with a wide grip...I'd want a good few reps in with it first.

But then again if you are at a place in your Cycle where your "top single" is easily manageable then please ignore.
Indeed and agreed.
I warm up ending with 155X5, then 212.5 X1 before hitting my top single.
I'll probably add 195 in there to get more of a feel gradually.

User avatar
augeleven
Registered User
Posts: 4489
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:47 pm
Location: 9th level
Age: 43

Re: Bench press width article

#31

Post by augeleven » Fri Dec 21, 2018 7:20 am

KDW wrote: Mon Dec 25, 2017 7:52 pm I'm gonna give this one a big nope. I bench index on ring and that's 32 inches grip width. This is where I'm strongest. I have done pinky on ring and middle finger on ring and this is just stronger. I measured the distance between my ac joints to be 17 inches. I'm nearly twice that distance in bench grip. Also, the wider grip feels better on my shoulders which is important to me since I've had surgery in the past.
This is super interesting. @mgil had some pics up on the gram advocating for a wider press grip.
With a wide bench grip, are you flaring out your elbows to keep your forearms vertical, or are you still thinking keeping them kinda tucked? I could be way off, but would a wider grip mean a lower touch point, which could mean less shoulder involvement/irritation?

User avatar
slowmotion
Registered User
Posts: 3195
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:39 am
Location: Norway
Age: 66

Re: Bench press width article

#32

Post by slowmotion » Fri Dec 21, 2018 7:58 am

I was using the index finger on the rings for a while, but got pain in both wrists and right elbow.
Moving my grip in a bit so I have the middle fingers on the rings got rid of the pain after only a week or so.
I figure if I can bench pain free that would mean getting a bigger bench in the long run.

User avatar
bobmen10000
Registered User
Posts: 1681
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 8:34 pm
Age: 43
Contact:

Re: Bench press width article

#33

Post by bobmen10000 » Fri Dec 21, 2018 9:46 am

I found it was more difficult to clear the hooks when using a wide(r) bench grip. Wouldn't matter if I had a handout or monolift attachment. Adjusting it an inch or two down seems to do the trick.

User avatar
Wilhelm
Little Musk Ox
Posts: 9728
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:58 pm
Location: Living Room
Age: 62

Re: Bench press width article

#34

Post by Wilhelm » Fri Dec 21, 2018 10:09 am

bobmen10000 wrote: Fri Dec 21, 2018 9:46 am I found it was more difficult to clear the hooks when using a wide(r) bench grip. Wouldn't matter if I had a handout or monolift attachment. Adjusting it an inch or two down seems to do the trick.
I'm going to have to be careful sitting back up as well.
I've done a couple set up tests. Was barefoot, and bench in my heels, but it seems like setting my scapula is a little easier.
I push down and in with my hands on the bar, then push back onto my traps.
Same end point, but it just all seems to go into place with less work with the hooks lower and the wider grip.

I'll know more tomorrow when i do it for real.

User avatar
iamsmu
Registered User
Posts: 4970
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:52 pm
Location: Handicap: +.3
Age: 49
Contact:

Re: Bench press width article

#35

Post by iamsmu » Fri Dec 21, 2018 10:12 am

Hanley wrote: Tue Dec 19, 2017 12:51 pm Huh. I sorta just default to "pinkies on rings", but this 1.5X measurement puts me at a 27" grip like cwd. That's "ring finger on rings” for me. I'll try it.
Exactly the same here. Ring finger on rings is pretty damn wide. I don't think I've ever bench that wide. I'll try it tonight. But it seems like upper arm length is going to change the angles here. And my upper arms are pretty short. . . .

User avatar
Hanley
Strength Nerd
Posts: 8761
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:35 pm
Age: 46

Re: Bench press width article

#36

Post by Hanley » Fri Dec 21, 2018 10:35 am

iamsmu wrote: Fri Dec 21, 2018 10:12 am
Hanley wrote: Tue Dec 19, 2017 12:51 pm Huh. I sorta just default to "pinkies on rings", but this 1.5X measurement puts me at a 27" grip like cwd. That's "ring finger on rings” for me. I'll try it.
Exactly the same here. Ring finger on rings is pretty damn wide. I don't think I've ever bench that wide. I'll try it tonight. But it seems like upper arm length is going to change the angles here. And my upper arms are pretty short. . . .
Well I posted that a year ago. I used the wider grip for a bunch of bench sessions, but I ended up moving my grip back in.

gtl
Registered User
Posts: 1700
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 10:04 am
Location: Naptown
Age: 38

Re: Bench press width article

#37

Post by gtl » Fri Dec 21, 2018 11:49 am

bobmen10000 wrote: Fri Dec 21, 2018 9:46 am I found it was more difficult to clear the hooks when using a wide(r) bench grip. Wouldn't matter if I had a handout or monolift attachment. Adjusting it an inch or two down seems to do the trick.
You probably have to adjust the height of your jhooks depending on the grip variance. If I do CGBP, I set my jhooks 1 hole higher than normal benching.

User avatar
KDW
HODGE
Posts: 542
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:37 pm
Age: 43

Re: Bench press width article

#38

Post by KDW » Fri Dec 21, 2018 8:02 pm

augeleven wrote: Fri Dec 21, 2018 7:20 am This is super interesting. @mgil had some pics up on the gram advocating for a wider press grip.
With a wide bench grip, are you flaring out your elbows to keep your forearms vertical, or are you still thinking keeping them kinda tucked? I could be way off, but would a wider grip mean a lower touch point, which could mean less shoulder involvement/irritation?
There's definitely a sweet spot. I don't purposefully flare or force a tuck either. My touch point is roughly around my xyphoid process. I really just think about getting the bar to that spot and everything works out for me. From a sideview, my elbows (Olecranon) are not directly under the bar when the bar is on my chest. They are slightly inferior of the bar. They don't get directly under the bar until lockout. So this looks like almost vertical forearms from the side.

If you are looking from the coronal view (top of my head), my forearms are not completely vertical that way either. This limits the amount of shoulder extension I need to make the touch. From this view my elbows are only slightly more extended than if I were to have vertical forearms. If I want vertical forearms from this angle, I need to take a middle finger on rings grip and maintain the same touch point. That slight change believe it or not will irritate my pec tendon after several weeks if I don't slowly introduce the new grip. The middle on ring grip is the maximum stretch I can get on the pec with barbell bench press.

From my current understanding of programming, if I want to avoid the shoulder irritation, I would just need some period of time where I gradually worked into a closer grip to allow for the shoulder to adapt to the different range of motion. Its just at this point, I don't necessarily need to do that to get to where I want to get nor would it necessarily serve a much of a purpose on my journey to 500 lb bench. I think in the past, I would just jump into a lift without building up a level of preparedness, and that's what led to the irritation moreso than just the movement itself.

User avatar
Wilhelm
Little Musk Ox
Posts: 9728
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:58 pm
Location: Living Room
Age: 62

Re: Bench press width article

#39

Post by Wilhelm » Sat Dec 22, 2018 7:05 am

I had to compromise and just go middle finger on the rings.
The feeling at max width that i was going to smash my fingers reracking on the hooks with my pesky 3" Rogue uprights was just too strong.
The bar collars would hit if i actually racked it so unevenly, but my hesistation on rerack remained, and that was dangerous in and of itself.

Wider grip does seem to help keep the bar from getting out in front as it sometimes does on later reps.
And i think i'm quicker off the chest this way, which is where i need help anyway.

It's just the first session, so i'll have a better opinion later.
Seems good though.

User avatar
cwd
Registered User
Posts: 3400
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:34 am
Location: central Ohio
Age: 58

Re: Bench press width article

#40

Post by cwd » Sat Dec 22, 2018 9:30 am

I moved out wider when I read that article, and felt stronger. Later I moved back in (to 24" wide, almost a close-grip bench) and saw no obvious reduction in strength.

The narrow grip is more comfortable and gives me an extra inch of ROM, so I assume it's better for hypertrophy/strength. I'm not a competing powerlifter so...

Post Reply