A Tale Told by an Idiot
Moderator: Chebass88
- EricK
- Marine Mammal
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 5:02 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
3/4/18 - Montana Method (MM), C2W1D1
BW - 192
Sqt:
285 x 5 x 2
285 x 3 x 5
TnGB:
295 x 1@7.5 (?)
245 x 5 x 3
245 x 3 x 5
CGBP:
225 x 11
C/U:
7 min density set - +15 lbs, 45 reps
Notes:
The hardest part was overcoming the anger associated with the fact that 70% < 315. But we have to work with what we got towards what we want and not what we want to just get stuck with what we have.
BW - 192
Sqt:
285 x 5 x 2
285 x 3 x 5
TnGB:
295 x 1@7.5 (?)
245 x 5 x 3
245 x 3 x 5
CGBP:
225 x 11
C/U:
7 min density set - +15 lbs, 45 reps
Notes:
The hardest part was overcoming the anger associated with the fact that 70% < 315. But we have to work with what we got towards what we want and not what we want to just get stuck with what we have.
- EricK
- Marine Mammal
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 5:02 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
Ate a brownie tonight in a delicious failed attempt to incentivize a toddler's compliance in vegetable eating.
#voluntaryhardship, #dadbod4evr
#voluntaryhardship, #dadbod4evr
- Allentown
- Likes Beer
- Posts: 10013
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:41 am
- Location: Grindville, West MI. Pop: 2 Gainzgoblins
- Age: 40
- Chebass88
- Big E
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 3:47 pm
- Location: Sometimes here. Sometimes there.
- Age: 44
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
This is an excellent quote.
I'm interested to see your progression on the Hanley program. I hope it works very well for you. I also like the "I eat a brownie, you eat veggies" shtick.
- EricK
- Marine Mammal
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 5:02 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
Haha, the idea was: "See, daddy gets to eat a brownie because he finished all his vegetables. If you finish your veggies, you can get one too!"
Response was: "I go to store." (Climbs down from chair, walks to the front door...)
Wife and me: "I guess he's just gonna get his own..."
Also, thanks @Chebass88, I have confidence in the plan.
- Allentown
- Likes Beer
- Posts: 10013
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:41 am
- Location: Grindville, West MI. Pop: 2 Gainzgoblins
- Age: 40
- tersh
- Registered User
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:42 am
- Location: Centrally Located Salt
- Age: 43
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
- EricK
- Marine Mammal
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 5:02 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
- EricK
- Marine Mammal
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 5:02 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
3/5/18 - Montana Method (MM), C2W1D2
BW - 191.3
DL:
295 x 2 x 8
Press (density):
10 min, 135 lbs, 39 reps
BB row:
135 x 10 x 4
CoC:
T x 5 x 2, #1 x 3, T x 10 x 4 (symmetrical)
Notes:
Having multiple logging UIs is silly.
BW - 191.3
DL:
295 x 2 x 8
Press (density):
10 min, 135 lbs, 39 reps
BB row:
135 x 10 x 4
CoC:
T x 5 x 2, #1 x 3, T x 10 x 4 (symmetrical)
Notes:
Having multiple logging UIs is silly.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 5122
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:54 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
Always glad when someone else starts logging their grip training!
Are you doing the gripper at work again?
If yes, are you inviting your co-workers to try the #1, and then giving them disgusted frowns when they fail to close it?
- EricK
- Marine Mammal
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 5:02 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
Not at work, unfortunately. I actually don't have enough time lately. Which I spose is good. But I figured I don't have much excuse for not getting any grip work with my home gym set up, especially after my embarrassing display with the smooth plate grip challenge.
- EricK
- Marine Mammal
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 5:02 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
BW - 192
Devil's Tricycle - 30 min, ~75 RPM, 325 cal
CoC: T x 5 x 5 (symmetrical)
Devil's Tricycle - 30 min, ~75 RPM, 325 cal
CoC: T x 5 x 5 (symmetrical)
- EricK
- Marine Mammal
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 5:02 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
The single biggest danger in business and life, other than outright failure, is to be successful without being resolutely clear about why you successful in the first place.
-Robert Burgelman, professor, Stanford Business School
3/7/18 - Montana Method (MM), C2W1D3
BW - 193.6
Sq:
255 x 3
300 x 2
340 x 1 x 2
360 x 1@6
P. Bench:
190 x 3
220 x 3 (supposed to be 2)
250 x 2
270 x 1@6
250 x 2 x 2 @6 (?)
BB curl:
85 x 15, 14, 12
CoC:
T x 5 x 2, #1 (asst) x 3, T x 12 x 4 (symmetrical)
Notes:
No timed rest. Just long enough to change plates and review video.
-Robert Burgelman, professor, Stanford Business School
3/7/18 - Montana Method (MM), C2W1D3
BW - 193.6
Sq:
255 x 3
300 x 2
340 x 1 x 2
360 x 1@6
P. Bench:
190 x 3
220 x 3 (supposed to be 2)
250 x 2
270 x 1@6
250 x 2 x 2 @6 (?)
BB curl:
85 x 15, 14, 12
CoC:
T x 5 x 2, #1 (asst) x 3, T x 12 x 4 (symmetrical)
Notes:
No timed rest. Just long enough to change plates and review video.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 5122
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:54 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
There's a great section on this in one of Taleb's books. He talks about how billionaires write books on their success. Not only do readers take away the wrong lessons, but the successful authors themselves may push the wrong lessons. The rich people misreport, misunderstand, and misattibute what got them there.
So there's a survivor bias in only looking at the successes.
Better source of information could be to read books about failures, find stuff the losers did that the winners didn't, via negativa. But those books are not as common.
The recovery continues!!!!
- Allentown
- Likes Beer
- Posts: 10013
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:41 am
- Location: Grindville, West MI. Pop: 2 Gainzgoblins
- Age: 40
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
But not Taleb, no sir, he's just better and smarter than everyone else!hector wrote: ↑Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:07 am There's a great section on this in one of Taleb's books. He talks about how billionaires write books on their success. Not only do readers take away the wrong lessons, but the successful authors themselves may push the wrong lessons. The rich people misreport, misunderstand, and misattibute what got them there.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 5122
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:54 pm
- Allentown
- Likes Beer
- Posts: 10013
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:41 am
- Location: Grindville, West MI. Pop: 2 Gainzgoblins
- Age: 40
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
My criticism of his writing is the thick layer of smugness that got all over my hands every time I turned a page. It required three hand-washings each time to get it all off.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 5122
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:54 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
I work with smug assholes for a living so I'm less sensitive to that stuff. I think there's value in his ideas if you get past the persona.
- Allentown
- Likes Beer
- Posts: 10013
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:41 am
- Location: Grindville, West MI. Pop: 2 Gainzgoblins
- Age: 40
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 5122
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:54 pm
Re: Performance Adjusted Excellence
Or maybe you were already too smart. I thought Fooled by Randomness was the worst book.
Antifragile was great. Especially the story of the first futures contract. (Done by a greek renting wine presses in a year where nobody thought the grape crops would be good. Turned out the grapes were good, the greek got rich.) This went on to the idea that we didn't understand low probability events well, and so unlikely events could potentially be way undervalued.