damufunman wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:29 am
Testiclaw wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:44 pm
We want a rigid body from ass to neck, and a controlled dip (shorter and slower than most people think) followed by a violent drive through the floor (on the full foot).
Is this along the lines of Catalyst's elastic vs strength dip and drive thing? I've found that a really short, slowish dip followed by a quick, aggressive drive sometimes works well. Usually forget to do that, and often dip too low (Along with a whole other host of problems).
It could be, I haven't looked into Catalysts video on it yet.
Outside of a few well-known outliers it seems like most lifters have a very deliberate dip speed, but aggressive leg drive. The cadence is important; you want to load the quads and tendons, so it can't be too slow...but you don't want to lose tension or drop fast enough and lose balance and posture...so it can't be too fast.
And because we're exploiting the properties of tendons and stretch-shortening-cycles, we don't want to go too low.
Most people, when they think aggressive leg drive, either turn that into a fast, spastic dip or they think they need to bend the knees more and more.
I think the distinction between jerk styles is something that can wait until the lifter is moving well and performing basic movements we'll to figure out. Too many people end up in the position of declaring, "I'm more suited towards X style" before they even develop basic proficiency.
The same happens with sumo/conventional pulling in powerlifting, for what it's worth.